<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (8) TMI 62 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25342</link>
    <description>The court upheld the disallowance of the deduction for the city compensatory allowance paid to the partners, ruling that it constituted remuneration falling under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Despite the firm&#039;s argument that it was a legitimate business expense, the court deemed the payment as part of the partners&#039; remuneration, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The judgment clarified that such payments, even if labeled as allowances, could be considered as remuneration under section 40(b) restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (8) TMI 62 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25342</link>
      <description>The court upheld the disallowance of the deduction for the city compensatory allowance paid to the partners, ruling that it constituted remuneration falling under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Despite the firm&#039;s argument that it was a legitimate business expense, the court deemed the payment as part of the partners&#039; remuneration, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The judgment clarified that such payments, even if labeled as allowances, could be considered as remuneration under section 40(b) restrictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>