<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1417 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294797</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the manufacturers in a case involving alleged clandestine procurement and clearance of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence to prove clandestine activities and found that reliance on third-party evidence alone was insufficient. As there was no tangible evidence linking the manufacturers to the alleged activities, the Tribunal set aside the order confirming the recovery and penalty imposed on the company and director. The appeal was allowed in favor of the manufacturers due to the lack of legal basis to sustain the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 21:01:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1417 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294797</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the manufacturers in a case involving alleged clandestine procurement and clearance of goods. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence to prove clandestine activities and found that reliance on third-party evidence alone was insufficient. As there was no tangible evidence linking the manufacturers to the alleged activities, the Tribunal set aside the order confirming the recovery and penalty imposed on the company and director. The appeal was allowed in favor of the manufacturers due to the lack of legal basis to sustain the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>