<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1415 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294795</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an importer of fabrics, in a case concerning the import of goods from China. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption from CVD under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was initially rejected due to non-compliance with self-assessment scheme requirements. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with amended conditions for post-amendment imports and upheld the appellant&#039;s argument based on previous judgments and strict interpretation of exemption notifications. The impugned decision was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 21:01:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1415 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294795</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, an importer of fabrics, in a case concerning the import of goods from China. The appellant&#039;s claim for exemption from CVD under Notification No. 30/2004-CE was initially rejected due to non-compliance with self-assessment scheme requirements. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with amended conditions for post-amendment imports and upheld the appellant&#039;s argument based on previous judgments and strict interpretation of exemption notifications. The impugned decision was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>