<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1804 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294802</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, affirming that the imported Gloves remained eligible for the exemption under Notification No.102-2007-Customs. The court rejected the argument that sterilization and repacking altered the nature of the Gloves, emphasizing that these processes did not change the essential character of the goods. Therefore, the petitioners were entitled to refund claims, and the court did not impose any costs on the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 21:01:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1804 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294802</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, affirming that the imported Gloves remained eligible for the exemption under Notification No.102-2007-Customs. The court rejected the argument that sterilization and repacking altered the nature of the Gloves, emphasizing that these processes did not change the essential character of the goods. Therefore, the petitioners were entitled to refund claims, and the court did not impose any costs on the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294802</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>