<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Revision Case: No Evidence Found to Justify Use of Section 263 in Dollar Exchange Loss Dispute.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57826</link>
    <description>Revision u/s 263 - Assessee had to bear the loss as value of US dollar increased over the period since receipts of the remittance and date of export. In most of the cases of the remittance, assessee utilized the forward exchange contract made in the last year where value of the US$ was fixed which is lower than the value of US$ on the date of actual remittance. - Revenue has not brought any material on record to demonstrate that the view taken by the AO was an impermissible view and was contrary to law or was upon erroneous application of legal principles necessitating the exercising of Revisionary powers u/s 263 of the Act. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 11:28:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 11:28:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Revision Case: No Evidence Found to Justify Use of Section 263 in Dollar Exchange Loss Dispute.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57826</link>
      <description>Revision u/s 263 - Assessee had to bear the loss as value of US dollar increased over the period since receipts of the remittance and date of export. In most of the cases of the remittance, assessee utilized the forward exchange contract made in the last year where value of the US$ was fixed which is lower than the value of US$ on the date of actual remittance. - Revenue has not brought any material on record to demonstrate that the view taken by the AO was an impermissible view and was contrary to law or was upon erroneous application of legal principles necessitating the exercising of Revisionary powers u/s 263 of the Act. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 11:28:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>