https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407211 The Delhi HC held that an interim injunction could not stand where the trial court had not considered the appellants' reply and written submissions already on record. As the order reflected only the plaintiff's case and did not engage with the rival stand on cargo release, lien, charges and carriage terms, the appellate court declined to decide the merits itself. It set aside the interim order in effect and remanded the interim application for fresh consideration by the trial court after hearing both sides and passing a detailed, reasoned order. en-us Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 May 2021 08:18:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407211 The Delhi HC held that an interim injunction could not stand where the trial court had not considered the appellants' reply and written submissions already on record. As the order reflected only the plaintiff's case and did not engage with the rival stand on cargo release, lien, charges and carriage terms, the appellate court declined to decide the merits itself. It set aside the interim order in effect and remanded the interim application for fresh consideration by the trial court after hearing both sides and passing a detailed, reasoned order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407211