https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407207 The court upheld the constitutional validity of Regulation 15A of the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, and Paragraph 2(iii) of the SEBI Circular dated 23 September 2020. It affirmed SEBI's authority to prescribe fees charged by Investment Advisers, dismissing claims of excessive delegation and violation of fundamental rights. The court found the impugned Circular issued by the General Manager of SEBI to be valid under the Delegation of Statutory and Financial Powers Order, 2019. The regulations and Circular were deemed reasonable, in the public interest, and within SEBI's regulatory powers, leading to the rejection of the petitioner's claims and interim relief request. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 May 2021 08:18:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407207 The court upheld the constitutional validity of Regulation 15A of the SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, and Paragraph 2(iii) of the SEBI Circular dated 23 September 2020. It affirmed SEBI's authority to prescribe fees charged by Investment Advisers, dismissing claims of excessive delegation and violation of fundamental rights. The court found the impugned Circular issued by the General Manager of SEBI to be valid under the Delegation of Statutory and Financial Powers Order, 2019. The regulations and Circular were deemed reasonable, in the public interest, and within SEBI's regulatory powers, leading to the rejection of the petitioner's claims and interim relief request. Case-Laws SEBI Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407207