https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407206 The court allowed the petitioner to amend the cause title to challenge an order by the Joint Commissioner (Appeals). The petitioner's appeal was initially dismissed for failing to make the mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017. Upon the petitioner's readiness to comply with the pre-deposit requirement, the court directed them to make the deposit within fifteen days. Once the deposit is made, the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) will hear the appeal promptly, aiming for a resolution within six weeks. Compliance with the deposit requirement would result in setting aside the impugned order for a reconsideration of the appeal on its merits. en-us Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407206 The court allowed the petitioner to amend the cause title to challenge an order by the Joint Commissioner (Appeals). The petitioner's appeal was initially dismissed for failing to make the mandatory pre-deposit under Section 107(6)(b) of the CGST Act, 2017. Upon the petitioner's readiness to comply with the pre-deposit requirement, the court directed them to make the deposit within fifteen days. Once the deposit is made, the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) will hear the appeal promptly, aiming for a resolution within six weeks. Compliance with the deposit requirement would result in setting aside the impugned order for a reconsideration of the appeal on its merits. Case-Laws GST Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407206