https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407204 A writ petition in PIL jurisdiction could not be used to bypass the statutory mechanism for winding up a multi-state cooperative society under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, because the Central Registrar is the authority empowered to act on audit, inquiry, inspection, or his own motion after hearing the society. The Court also declined to order release of properties provisionally attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, since attachment is subject to confirmation under the Act and immediate release was premature. The petition was therefore not maintainable for the reliefs sought, leaving parties to pursue statutory remedies. en-us Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 May 2021 08:18:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407204 A writ petition in PIL jurisdiction could not be used to bypass the statutory mechanism for winding up a multi-state cooperative society under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, because the Central Registrar is the authority empowered to act on audit, inquiry, inspection, or his own motion after hearing the society. The Court also declined to order release of properties provisionally attached under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, since attachment is subject to confirmation under the Act and immediate release was premature. The petition was therefore not maintainable for the reliefs sought, leaving parties to pursue statutory remedies. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407204