<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 73 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407194</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271B for delayed filing of the Tax audit report. The decision emphasized genuine reasons for the delay, attributing it to technical challenges and workload pressures faced by the Chartered Accountants firm. The ITAT found the delay reasonable and not intentional, directing the AO to cancel the penalty due to the absence of deliberate misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 08:17:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 73 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407194</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271B for delayed filing of the Tax audit report. The decision emphasized genuine reasons for the delay, attributing it to technical challenges and workload pressures faced by the Chartered Accountants firm. The ITAT found the delay reasonable and not intentional, directing the AO to cancel the penalty due to the absence of deliberate misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>