<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 29 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25334</link>
    <description>Non-compliance with an express undertaking given before the Tribunal to furnish the statement of the case justified the High Court in declining to answer the income-tax reference. The Court noted that the Revenue could not produce the statement of the case or explain what steps had been taken after an earlier adjournment, and it refused a further adjournment as a matter of discretion. The reference was therefore returned unanswered, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:21:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 29 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25334</link>
      <description>Non-compliance with an express undertaking given before the Tribunal to furnish the statement of the case justified the High Court in declining to answer the income-tax reference. The Court noted that the Revenue could not produce the statement of the case or explain what steps had been taken after an earlier adjournment, and it refused a further adjournment as a matter of discretion. The reference was therefore returned unanswered, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>