<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 58 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings invalid due to ambiguity in the penalty notice and the absence of conscious concealment of income by the assessee. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) for Long Term Capital Gain was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2021 08:16:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 58 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty proceedings invalid due to ambiguity in the penalty notice and the absence of conscious concealment of income by the assessee. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) for Long Term Capital Gain was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>