https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407176 Section 427(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits concurrent running of sentences only for substantive imprisonment, not for default imprisonment imposed for non-payment of fine or compensation. In multiple cheque dishonour matters, the court held that default sentences cannot be directed to run concurrently under that provision, and the fact that the complainants were different and the transactions were separate also supported refusal of the request. Relief seeking concurrent treatment of the default sentences was therefore rejected. en-us Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407176 Section 427(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits concurrent running of sentences only for substantive imprisonment, not for default imprisonment imposed for non-payment of fine or compensation. In multiple cheque dishonour matters, the court held that default sentences cannot be directed to run concurrently under that provision, and the fact that the complainants were different and the transactions were separate also supported refusal of the request. Relief seeking concurrent treatment of the default sentences was therefore rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407176