<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2798 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294769</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners&#039; representations regarding the deduction of TDS by the 2nd respondent, conduct an inquiry, and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. The judgment disposed of the writ petitions with these directions, without imposing costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 17:54:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2798 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294769</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioners&#039; representations regarding the deduction of TDS by the 2nd respondent, conduct an inquiry, and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. The judgment disposed of the writ petitions with these directions, without imposing costs, and closed the connected miscellaneous petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>