<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Petitioner Seeks Name &quot;Reef Center for Wellness and Excellence LLP,&quot; Argues No Conflict with Existing Class 05 Registrations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57803</link>
    <description>Application for reservation of the name “Reef Center for Wellness and Excellence LLP” - The case of the petitioner in fact stands on a stronger footing. The registration of word mark already granted by the respondents are “REEFLEC&#039;, REEF”, “REEFIT FORTE”, “REEFER (HEMATANIC)” which are all for products falling under Class 05. The petitioner seeks the name “Reef Wellness and Excellence LLP”, not for any product but for a service, and that too which does not fall under Class 05. The name proposed by the petitioner cannot be said to be identical or deceptively similar - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:17:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:17:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Petitioner Seeks Name &quot;Reef Center for Wellness and Excellence LLP,&quot; Argues No Conflict with Existing Class 05 Registrations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57803</link>
      <description>Application for reservation of the name “Reef Center for Wellness and Excellence LLP” - The case of the petitioner in fact stands on a stronger footing. The registration of word mark already granted by the respondents are “REEFLEC&#039;, REEF”, “REEFIT FORTE”, “REEFER (HEMATANIC)” which are all for products falling under Class 05. The petitioner seeks the name “Reef Wellness and Excellence LLP”, not for any product but for a service, and that too which does not fall under Class 05. The name proposed by the petitioner cannot be said to be identical or deceptively similar - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 10:17:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=57803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>