<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 53 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407174</link>
    <description>The court granted the petitioners&#039; applications for early hearing of pending applications in the writ petitions. However, due to non-compliance with previous court orders, the matters were passed over. The respondent-revenue&#039;s counsel was instructed to ensure the concerned officer&#039;s participation in virtual court proceedings. Despite the officers&#039; absence due to illness, an assurance was given that a speaking order on the petitioners&#039; representation would be passed before the next hearing. The court scheduled the matter for further proceedings, emphasizing compliance with previous orders and consideration of a specific Supreme Court judgment in the decision-making process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 53 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407174</link>
      <description>The court granted the petitioners&#039; applications for early hearing of pending applications in the writ petitions. However, due to non-compliance with previous court orders, the matters were passed over. The respondent-revenue&#039;s counsel was instructed to ensure the concerned officer&#039;s participation in virtual court proceedings. Despite the officers&#039; absence due to illness, an assurance was given that a speaking order on the petitioners&#039; representation would be passed before the next hearing. The court scheduled the matter for further proceedings, emphasizing compliance with previous orders and consideration of a specific Supreme Court judgment in the decision-making process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>