<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 51 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407172</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 272 (1)(e) of the Companies Act is not ultra vires the Constitution of India. Additionally, the court found that the order dated January 18, 2021, did not require any interference and dismissed the writ petition, imposing a cost of Rs. Five Lakhs on the petitioner payable to the Registrar General of the court within four weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2021 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 51 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407172</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 272 (1)(e) of the Companies Act is not ultra vires the Constitution of India. Additionally, the court found that the order dated January 18, 2021, did not require any interference and dismissed the writ petition, imposing a cost of Rs. Five Lakhs on the petitioner payable to the Registrar General of the court within four weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>