<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 49 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407170</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the judgments of conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting the petitioner-accused following a settlement with the complainant bank. The offense was compounded under Section 147, and the interim order was vacated. Bail bonds were discharged, and any deposited amount was ordered to be refunded. The petition and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 18:06:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 49 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407170</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the judgments of conviction and sentence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting the petitioner-accused following a settlement with the complainant bank. The offense was compounded under Section 147, and the interim order was vacated. Bail bonds were discharged, and any deposited amount was ordered to be refunded. The petition and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>