<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407167</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening assessments. It held that the notices were valid as they were signed and dispatched within the prescribed limitation period, emphasizing that the issuance of notice is crucial for compliance with Section 149. The court clarified that delays in service do not render the notice invalid. The petitioners were advised to proceed with their cases in accordance with the Income Tax Act, with no orders as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2021 09:31:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 46 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407167</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for reopening assessments. It held that the notices were valid as they were signed and dispatched within the prescribed limitation period, emphasizing that the issuance of notice is crucial for compliance with Section 149. The court clarified that delays in service do not render the notice invalid. The petitioners were advised to proceed with their cases in accordance with the Income Tax Act, with no orders as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>