<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (5) TMI 29 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407150</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148 of the I.T. Act, 1961. However, it ruled in favor of the assessee by deleting the additions of Rs. 45 lakhs under section 68 and Rs. 90,000 under section 69C. The Tribunal found insufficient justification for these additions due to lack of evidence provided by the assessee and the inability to cross-examine key statements used by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (5) TMI 29 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407150</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment under sections 147/148 of the I.T. Act, 1961. However, it ruled in favor of the assessee by deleting the additions of Rs. 45 lakhs under section 68 and Rs. 90,000 under section 69C. The Tribunal found insufficient justification for these additions due to lack of evidence provided by the assessee and the inability to cross-examine key statements used by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>