https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294753 A fresh writ petition challenging alleged RBI inaction was held not maintainable because the petitioner had already pursued the same grievance before the Delhi High Court, in a prior PIL, and through a private complaint. The Court applied the principle underlying Sarguja Transport Service and treated the repeated filing on the same subject matter, after unconditional withdrawal of the earlier PIL without liberty, as an abuse of process. It also held that the earlier Delhi High Court direction to consider the complaints, and the withdrawal of the prior PIL, were not decisions on merits and therefore did not satisfy the requirements of res judicata. en-us Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:57:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294753 A fresh writ petition challenging alleged RBI inaction was held not maintainable because the petitioner had already pursued the same grievance before the Delhi High Court, in a prior PIL, and through a private complaint. The Court applied the principle underlying Sarguja Transport Service and treated the repeated filing on the same subject matter, after unconditional withdrawal of the earlier PIL without liberty, as an abuse of process. It also held that the earlier Delhi High Court direction to consider the complaints, and the withdrawal of the prior PIL, were not decisions on merits and therefore did not satisfy the requirements of res judicata. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294753