<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1923 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294742</link>
    <description>In share subscription cases, an addition under section 68 is not sustainable where the assessee produces credible documents showing the investors&#039; identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction. Share application forms, PAN details, income-tax returns, bank statements, confirmations, incorporation records and balance sheets can establish a documented money trail through banking channels. An uncorroborated report that investor companies could not be traced at their addresses, by itself, does not displace such evidence. The Revenue must bring material to show that the impugned funds belong to the assessee; suspicion alone is insufficient, and the addition was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:57:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1923 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294742</link>
      <description>In share subscription cases, an addition under section 68 is not sustainable where the assessee produces credible documents showing the investors&#039; identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction. Share application forms, PAN details, income-tax returns, bank statements, confirmations, incorporation records and balance sheets can establish a documented money trail through banking channels. An uncorroborated report that investor companies could not be traced at their addresses, by itself, does not displace such evidence. The Revenue must bring material to show that the impugned funds belong to the assessee; suspicion alone is insufficient, and the addition was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>