<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 1880 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294752</link>
    <description>The Court remanded the matter back to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata for a fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need to evaluate why the revisionist&#039;s case should not be viewed similarly to the precedent set by the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal. The revisional applications were disposed of with no order as to costs, and parties were to receive certified copies of the order upon compliance with formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 19:57:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 1880 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294752</link>
      <description>The Court remanded the matter back to the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata for a fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the need to evaluate why the revisionist&#039;s case should not be viewed similarly to the precedent set by the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal. The revisional applications were disposed of with no order as to costs, and parties were to receive certified copies of the order upon compliance with formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>