https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294734 The Supreme Court accepted a settlement placed by the parties and disposed of the appeal in terms of that compromise. It treated the revised arrangement as reasonable and just, and gave effect to it by directing payment of money, allotment of property, withdrawal of attachment, and allocation of lands by an agreed neutral person whose decision on allotment was final. The settlement thus superseded the earlier arrangement, and the appeal ended with implementation of the compromise and no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 04 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294734 The Supreme Court accepted a settlement placed by the parties and disposed of the appeal in terms of that compromise. It treated the revised arrangement as reasonable and just, and gave effect to it by directing payment of money, allotment of property, withdrawal of attachment, and allocation of lands by an agreed neutral person whose decision on allotment was final. The settlement thus superseded the earlier arrangement, and the appeal ended with implementation of the compromise and no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294734