https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407120 A belated defence request to send a cheque for handwriting expert opinion was properly refused where it was made after the accused had entered defence, the matter was at the argument stage, and the trial court recorded reasons under Section 243 CrPC; the refusal did not vitiate the trial or deny a fair opportunity. Conviction for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act was sustained because the evidence proved the business liability, issuance and dishonour of the cheque, service of demand notice, and non-payment, while the bank manager's evidence and signature comparison under Section 73 of the Evidence Act supported the findings. The revision failed and the conviction and sentence were maintained. en-us Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:26:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407120 A belated defence request to send a cheque for handwriting expert opinion was properly refused where it was made after the accused had entered defence, the matter was at the argument stage, and the trial court recorded reasons under Section 243 CrPC; the refusal did not vitiate the trial or deny a fair opportunity. Conviction for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act was sustained because the evidence proved the business liability, issuance and dishonour of the cheque, service of demand notice, and non-payment, while the bank manager's evidence and signature comparison under Section 73 of the Evidence Act supported the findings. The revision failed and the conviction and sentence were maintained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407120