<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1229 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407113</link>
    <description>Customs verification under the CAROTAR regime was not treated as a mere random exercise where the authorities called for additional documents, examined the declaration and cost break-up, and formed a prima facie view that origin and value-addition particulars required scrutiny. On that basis, initiation of verification on a deficiency-related basis and insistence on security for provisional release under Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 were upheld. The importer had been informed of the reason for withholding clearance and of the option of provisional assessment, but did not furnish the required security. Relief to clear the goods without bank guarantee or equivalent security was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1229 - TRIPURA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407113</link>
      <description>Customs verification under the CAROTAR regime was not treated as a mere random exercise where the authorities called for additional documents, examined the declaration and cost break-up, and formed a prima facie view that origin and value-addition particulars required scrutiny. On that basis, initiation of verification on a deficiency-related basis and insistence on security for provisional release under Section 18 of the Customs Act, 1962 were upheld. The importer had been informed of the reason for withholding clearance and of the option of provisional assessment, but did not furnish the required security. Relief to clear the goods without bank guarantee or equivalent security was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>