https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407108 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the cancellation of the registration by the Commissioner. It concluded that the Commissioner had the jurisdiction and power to cancel the registration even before the 2010 amendment, and the reasons for cancellation were valid and in accordance with the law. The court emphasized that the 2010 amendment was clarificatory and did not retrospectively confer new powers on the Commissioner. en-us Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Sep 2021 15:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407108 The court dismissed the writ petition, upholding the cancellation of the registration by the Commissioner. It concluded that the Commissioner had the jurisdiction and power to cancel the registration even before the 2010 amendment, and the reasons for cancellation were valid and in accordance with the law. The court emphasized that the 2010 amendment was clarificatory and did not retrospectively confer new powers on the Commissioner. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407108