<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2032 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the exemption under section 54, considering the date of allotment as the date of acquisition for computing capital gains. It emphasized consistency in decisions, referred to various judgments and circulars, and directed the AO to allow the exemption claimed by the assessee, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:19:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2032 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the exemption under section 54, considering the date of allotment as the date of acquisition for computing capital gains. It emphasized consistency in decisions, referred to various judgments and circulars, and directed the AO to allow the exemption claimed by the assessee, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>