https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294727 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the ROM applications filed by the assessee for rectification of mistakes in the final order. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in stating that separate freight charges were collected from customers, when in fact, freight charges were included in the assessable value. The impugned order was modified to accurately reflect that no separate freight charges were collected, aligning with the factual position presented by the appellant. This rectification ensured the order's consistency with the actual events and upheld the integrity of the decision. en-us Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Apr 2021 20:19:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294727 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the ROM applications filed by the assessee for rectification of mistakes in the final order. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in stating that separate freight charges were collected from customers, when in fact, freight charges were included in the assessable value. The impugned order was modified to accurately reflect that no separate freight charges were collected, aligning with the factual position presented by the appellant. This rectification ensured the order's consistency with the actual events and upheld the integrity of the decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294727