<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1172 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407056</link>
    <description>Bail under Section 439 CrPC was sought in proceedings alleging offences under Section 132 of the CGST Act, with the Court considering the petitioner&#039;s role, alleged fake invoices, and the extent of the input tax credit involved. On those facts, it found no reason to exercise discretion in favour of release, and bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=643018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1172 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407056</link>
      <description>Bail under Section 439 CrPC was sought in proceedings alleging offences under Section 132 of the CGST Act, with the Court considering the petitioner&#039;s role, alleged fake invoices, and the extent of the input tax credit involved. On those facts, it found no reason to exercise discretion in favour of release, and bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>