<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 32 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25299</link>
    <description>Higher rebate on automobile ancillaries used in assembling the assessee&#039;s own cars was allowed because the point was already covered by an earlier decision on the same issue, which the court followed. A tube-well constructed during the assessment year was also treated as &quot;plant&quot; for development rebate purposes, since it was used to obtain water necessary for production and industrial labour. Applying the broad meaning of &quot;plant&quot; under section 43(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the analogous approach under the earlier Act, the court held that a business installation serving productive operations can qualify for development rebate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:19:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 32 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25299</link>
      <description>Higher rebate on automobile ancillaries used in assembling the assessee&#039;s own cars was allowed because the point was already covered by an earlier decision on the same issue, which the court followed. A tube-well constructed during the assessment year was also treated as &quot;plant&quot; for development rebate purposes, since it was used to obtain water necessary for production and industrial labour. Applying the broad meaning of &quot;plant&quot; under section 43(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the analogous approach under the earlier Act, the court held that a business installation serving productive operations can qualify for development rebate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>