<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 397 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order u/s 263, finding that the original assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to the lack of discussion on the set off of loss u/s 72A. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the premature show cause notice and validity of the CIT&#039;s order were dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on 11th January 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:03:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642954" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 397 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order u/s 263, finding that the original assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to the lack of discussion on the set off of loss u/s 72A. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the premature show cause notice and validity of the CIT&#039;s order were dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on 11th January 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>