<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1126 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the quantum appeal back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to the assessee&#039;s absence during hearings, emphasizing the need for cooperation. The penalty appeal under Section 271A was also sent back for reconsideration based on the outcome of the quantum appeal. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1126 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the quantum appeal back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to the assessee&#039;s absence during hearings, emphasizing the need for cooperation. The penalty appeal under Section 271A was also sent back for reconsideration based on the outcome of the quantum appeal. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=407010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>