<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1929 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294686</link>
    <description>Rule 8D was applied prospectively from assessment year 2008-09, so a Section 14A disallowance based solely on that Rule could not survive for assessment year 2007-08, while later years&#039; formula-based disallowances were sustained. Commission paid to non-resident agents for procuring business abroad was treated as non-taxable in India because it was not managerial, technical or consultancy income, the agents carried on no operations in India, and no withholding was required under Section 195; the related Section 40(a)(i) disallowance therefore failed. VAT refund was not taxable where the underlying expenditure had not been claimed as a deduction, and the brought-forward business loss set-off issue was left for factual verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:51:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642918" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1929 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294686</link>
      <description>Rule 8D was applied prospectively from assessment year 2008-09, so a Section 14A disallowance based solely on that Rule could not survive for assessment year 2007-08, while later years&#039; formula-based disallowances were sustained. Commission paid to non-resident agents for procuring business abroad was treated as non-taxable in India because it was not managerial, technical or consultancy income, the agents carried on no operations in India, and no withholding was required under Section 195; the related Section 40(a)(i) disallowance therefore failed. VAT refund was not taxable where the underlying expenditure had not been claimed as a deduction, and the brought-forward business loss set-off issue was left for factual verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>