https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294685 The tribunal allowed both appeals for statistical purposes. It deleted the addition under section 69C for alleged cash payments to key employees, citing lack of evidence and discrepancies in proving the alleged cash payments. Additionally, the tribunal ruled against the addition under section 14A and Rule 8D for interest and administrative expenses for the assessment year 2010-11, noting the lack of new investments and failure to establish the nature of funds. en-us Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:51:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294685 The tribunal allowed both appeals for statistical purposes. It deleted the addition under section 69C for alleged cash payments to key employees, citing lack of evidence and discrepancies in proving the alleged cash payments. Additionally, the tribunal ruled against the addition under section 14A and Rule 8D for interest and administrative expenses for the assessment year 2010-11, noting the lack of new investments and failure to establish the nature of funds. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294685