<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2797 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration based on previous decisions and lack of clarity on the income element from subscription charges. The judgment highlighted the importance of determining the actual income element before allowing TDS credit, emphasizing a thorough examination of financial statements and ledger accounts to establish the income position accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:51:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2797 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, remitting the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration based on previous decisions and lack of clarity on the income element from subscription charges. The judgment highlighted the importance of determining the actual income element before allowing TDS credit, emphasizing a thorough examination of financial statements and ledger accounts to establish the income position accurately. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>