https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406992 The court held that the Division Bench judgment in M/s. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. regarding the retrospective applicability of the 2016 amendment to the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 is binding. The court clarified that decisions from other High Courts have persuasive value but are not binding. Interim relief was granted to the petitioners, and the respondent authorities were given six weeks to file their affidavits-in-opposition. en-us Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2021 16:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406992 The court held that the Division Bench judgment in M/s. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. regarding the retrospective applicability of the 2016 amendment to the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 is binding. The court clarified that decisions from other High Courts have persuasive value but are not binding. Interim relief was granted to the petitioners, and the respondent authorities were given six weeks to file their affidavits-in-opposition. Case-Laws Benami Property Fri, 16 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406992