<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1107 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406991</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the impugned order due to multiple violations of timelines under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 (CBLR). Emphasizing the mandatory nature of the timelines, the Court held that the delays in issuing notices, preparing inquiry reports, and passing orders constituted violations. Previous decisions underscored the importance of adhering strictly to prescribed timelines for prompt completion of proceedings. A circular by the Central Board of Excise and Customs highlighted the need for timely completion of suspension proceedings. The writ petition was allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1107 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406991</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the impugned order due to multiple violations of timelines under the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 (CBLR). Emphasizing the mandatory nature of the timelines, the Court held that the delays in issuing notices, preparing inquiry reports, and passing orders constituted violations. Previous decisions underscored the importance of adhering strictly to prescribed timelines for prompt completion of proceedings. A circular by the Central Board of Excise and Customs highlighted the need for timely completion of suspension proceedings. The writ petition was allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>