<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406988</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the retrospective amendment to the third proviso to Section 80HHC, finding it unfairly impacted certain assessees with export turnover above a specified threshold. The Court directed equal treatment for exporters regardless of turnover, emphasizing fairness and clarity in applying the law. The Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeals raised by the Revenue, aligning with the Supreme Court precedent and deciding against the Revenue without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:18:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1104 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406988</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the retrospective amendment to the third proviso to Section 80HHC, finding it unfairly impacted certain assessees with export turnover above a specified threshold. The Court directed equal treatment for exporters regardless of turnover, emphasizing fairness and clarity in applying the law. The Court dismissed the Tax Case Appeals raised by the Revenue, aligning with the Supreme Court precedent and deciding against the Revenue without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>