https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406973 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant for a failed seafood import. It found that the appellant had not violated import prohibitions, acted in good faith to comply with safety standards, and did not warrant confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing the lack of culpable mental state and absence of import violations as reasons for overturning the penalties. en-us Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Oct 2021 14:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406973 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant for a failed seafood import. It found that the appellant had not violated import prohibitions, acted in good faith to comply with safety standards, and did not warrant confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing the lack of culpable mental state and absence of import violations as reasons for overturning the penalties. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406973