<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1073 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406957</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench, condoned a delay of 379 days in filing an Application for restoration of a Petition under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal found that the delay was due to miscommunication and the non-appearance of the Applicant&#039;s representative, leading to the dismissal of the Petition. Despite efforts to locate the misplaced case bundle, the Tribunal accepted the Applicant&#039;s explanation and emphasized the need for a liberal construction of &#039;sufficient cause&#039; under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the matter to proceed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 12:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1073 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406957</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai Bench, condoned a delay of 379 days in filing an Application for restoration of a Petition under the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal found that the delay was due to miscommunication and the non-appearance of the Applicant&#039;s representative, leading to the dismissal of the Petition. Despite efforts to locate the misplaced case bundle, the Tribunal accepted the Applicant&#039;s explanation and emphasized the need for a liberal construction of &#039;sufficient cause&#039; under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the matter to proceed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>