<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1069 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406953</link>
    <description>A single homebuyer could not maintain a section 7 application after the collective filing threshold for homebuyers was not met, and the petition failed on that basis. A decree holder could not use section 7 to execute an adjudicated claim because a decree does not itself create a financial debt arising from the time value of money, so the applicant was not a financial creditor for CIRP purposes. A tripartite bank arrangement also prevented the petitioner from proceeding alone, as the bank retained the relevant repayment rights and was a necessary party. The section 7 application was held not maintainable, leaving other legal remedies open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1069 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406953</link>
      <description>A single homebuyer could not maintain a section 7 application after the collective filing threshold for homebuyers was not met, and the petition failed on that basis. A decree holder could not use section 7 to execute an adjudicated claim because a decree does not itself create a financial debt arising from the time value of money, so the applicant was not a financial creditor for CIRP purposes. A tripartite bank arrangement also prevented the petitioner from proceeding alone, as the bank retained the relevant repayment rights and was a necessary party. The section 7 application was held not maintainable, leaving other legal remedies open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>