https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294664 A commercial supply dispute over rejected garments was held to be civil in nature, not a case of cheating or criminal breach of trust. The complaint did not show deception or fraudulent inducement at the inception of the transaction, and it also failed to allege entrustment in the manner required for criminal breach of trust. On the admitted facts, the allegations arose from contractual non-payment and product rejection, so criminal liability could not be fastened merely because the appellants held company positions. The criminal proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed and the summons set aside. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:06:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294664 A commercial supply dispute over rejected garments was held to be civil in nature, not a case of cheating or criminal breach of trust. The complaint did not show deception or fraudulent inducement at the inception of the transaction, and it also failed to allege entrustment in the manner required for criminal breach of trust. On the admitted facts, the allegations arose from contractual non-payment and product rejection, so criminal liability could not be fastened merely because the appellants held company positions. The criminal proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed and the summons set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294664