<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25281</link>
    <description>The HC declared Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, unconstitutional, citing its violation of Article 14 due to arbitrary classification, expansion of taxable income beyond permissible limits, and imposition of unfair penal liabilities on HUFs. Consequently, various writ petitions challenging notices, assessments, and rejections related to Section 171(9) were allowed, quashing the respective demands and proceedings. No order as to costs was made in these writ petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:04:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25281</link>
      <description>The HC declared Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, unconstitutional, citing its violation of Article 14 due to arbitrary classification, expansion of taxable income beyond permissible limits, and imposition of unfair penal liabilities on HUFs. Consequently, various writ petitions challenging notices, assessments, and rejections related to Section 171(9) were allowed, quashing the respective demands and proceedings. No order as to costs was made in these writ petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>