https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294660 Interim protection may be granted where striking out pleadings or affidavit evidence under challenge would truncate an expedited trial and later success in the challenge would require reopening evidence and recalling witnesses. The Court found that a temporary stay of the order striking out parts of the written statements and chief-examination affidavit would not prejudice the opposing parties, because irrelevant material could still be excluded if necessary. By contrast, no stay could be granted against refusal of an amendment application because no operative amendment existed to suspend. The result was limited protection against disruption of the trial, while amendment-related relief was declined. en-us Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294660 Interim protection may be granted where striking out pleadings or affidavit evidence under challenge would truncate an expedited trial and later success in the challenge would require reopening evidence and recalling witnesses. The Court found that a temporary stay of the order striking out parts of the written statements and chief-examination affidavit would not prejudice the opposing parties, because irrelevant material could still be excluded if necessary. By contrast, no stay could be granted against refusal of an amendment application because no operative amendment existed to suspend. The result was limited protection against disruption of the trial, while amendment-related relief was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294660