<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1054 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406938</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction was declined where the challenge to a GST summary order concerned alleged non-consideration of the reply and breach of natural justice, because the CGST Act provides a statutory appeal under Section 107 against orders passed under the Act. The petitioner was left to raise all grievances before the appellate authority within the prescribed period, and the reasoned order was to be supplied if not already furnished so that the appeal remedy was not obstructed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1054 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406938</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction was declined where the challenge to a GST summary order concerned alleged non-consideration of the reply and breach of natural justice, because the CGST Act provides a statutory appeal under Section 107 against orders passed under the Act. The petitioner was left to raise all grievances before the appellate authority within the prescribed period, and the reasoned order was to be supplied if not already furnished so that the appeal remedy was not obstructed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>