<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1053 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406937</link>
    <description>The Court directed the parties to the respondent authorities for adjudication of the show cause notice within a week. The petitioner&#039;s averments in the petition were to be construed as the reply to the show cause notice. Any additional submissions by the petitioner were to be filed electronically. The respondent authority was instructed to adjudicate the matter by a specified date, taking into account the reply and other materials, and considering the decided case law on the subject. The Court disposed of all three petitions accordingly, emphasizing that the merits of the matter had not been considered, and the adjudication was to be done in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1053 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406937</link>
      <description>The Court directed the parties to the respondent authorities for adjudication of the show cause notice within a week. The petitioner&#039;s averments in the petition were to be construed as the reply to the show cause notice. Any additional submissions by the petitioner were to be filed electronically. The respondent authority was instructed to adjudicate the matter by a specified date, taking into account the reply and other materials, and considering the decided case law on the subject. The Court disposed of all three petitions accordingly, emphasizing that the merits of the matter had not been considered, and the adjudication was to be done in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>