<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1032 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406916</link>
    <description>At the stage of framing charge, the court will not weigh the defence version if the material discloses a strong prima facie case or grave suspicion. On the complaint and witness statements, collection of money from investors on promises of high returns and non-refund supported charges of criminal breach of trust and cheating. The alleged investment certificates also indicated a money circulation scheme with reciprocal repayment linked to the plan period, bringing the conduct within the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. A prior report of the Competent Authority was not a precondition for FIR or charge, and the special depositor-protection statute did not bar ordinary criminal process at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1032 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406916</link>
      <description>At the stage of framing charge, the court will not weigh the defence version if the material discloses a strong prima facie case or grave suspicion. On the complaint and witness statements, collection of money from investors on promises of high returns and non-refund supported charges of criminal breach of trust and cheating. The alleged investment certificates also indicated a money circulation scheme with reciprocal repayment linked to the plan period, bringing the conduct within the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. A prior report of the Competent Authority was not a precondition for FIR or charge, and the special depositor-protection statute did not bar ordinary criminal process at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>