<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1030 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406914</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they were based on a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer (AO) and did not meet the jurisdictional requirements. The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent assessment order. The court emphasized the importance of tangible material for the AO to believe in income escapement, as per established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=642745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1030 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406914</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they were based on a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer (AO) and did not meet the jurisdictional requirements. The court quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent assessment order. The court emphasized the importance of tangible material for the AO to believe in income escapement, as per established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=406914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>