<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (11) TMI 73 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25276</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the inclusion of tax deductible at source in the computation of net wealth was an error apparent on the face of the record and rectifiable under section 35 of the Wealth-tax Act. Consequently, the Court did not address the second issue. Each party was directed to bear their own costs, and the judgment was to be sent to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:09:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (11) TMI 73 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25276</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the inclusion of tax deductible at source in the computation of net wealth was an error apparent on the face of the record and rectifiable under section 35 of the Wealth-tax Act. Consequently, the Court did not address the second issue. Each party was directed to bear their own costs, and the judgment was to be sent to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>